"For centuries, since the Middle Ages, chests, tributes or taxes used to be finalists.
From time to time, the king or the nobles requested money from the pecheros (a social condition that is not determined by wealth, but exclusively due to the obligation to contribute to the payment of a type of personal tax: the so-called ordinary and extraordinary service), to meet the expenses of the court or of warlike companies.
As is logical, the procedure ended up being a continuous exaction, which ruined peasants and artisans, that is, those who were not hidalgos. In time, the modern state came into being and a more regular method of subsidizing public expenditures was organized.
With the adoption of a constitutional system, the principle was agreed that only taxes approved by Parliament were accepted.
In addition, the providence was added that the taxes WERE NOT GOING TO BE FINAL, but were integrated into the treasury (which is always public; it goes without saying).
Moreover, the expenses of the House of the King were anticipated, like the others, in the budget law.
Unfortunately, this is all old water.
For some time now, all the authorities have imposed whatever contributions they want.
I don't know why he is armed so much tole tole with the budget law. Lately, things have degraded even more.
See, for example, the decision of the Government (which does not go through the Cortes) on the increase in pensions.
They are going to cover it with a new tax that will be applied to multinational technology companies.
How is it possible that at this point a FINALIST tax is implanted and nobody protests? Very simple: taxpayers think it is very good to raise taxes on "the rich." Wonder so naivete. The grievances don't end here.
Multinational tech companies will easily absorb the new tax and pass it on to prices.
In other words, in the end the alleged equity is not what it seems.
Anyone who sells something manages to pass taxes on to buyers.
That is why retirees, who no longer sell anything, swallow all the taxes and contributions imposed by those in charge.
" (Armando de Miguel.
06/05/2018) The Municipal Socialist Group of Totana wants us to also take the average age in tax matters (for the moment) to the totaneros pecheros and for this, they propose to study the implementation of the "Amazon Rate", for the large electronic commerce platforms Unique, based outside the municipality.
It would be, they say; "of taxing large companies, for the use of public space, the traffic and the pollution they generate, to allocate the proceeds, to promote and encourage local local commerce." That is, to impose a tax with a "finalist" character with the fallacious argument that this will have a direct impact on small and medium-sized companies in the municipality of Totana.
As with pensions. http://totana.news/1117624470 But at the end of the statement they contradict themselves and we went from; "...
to allocate the proceeds, to promote and encourage local local commerce ..." to "...
and we even think that it would be desirable to allocate the proceeds to the proximity commerce ...".
Be that as it may, that is a legal impossibility and whoever wrote that statement, what they do not understand, is what and cannot be put into practice.
But what else will it give? The law does not go with them and think before writing or documenting, it seems that neither. These large companies already pay taxes to the Spanish State, circulation taxes on their vehicles where they are registered and taxes for polluting and Totana, if I am not mistaken, is still part of the Spanish State.
But the totanero socialist revolutionaries want to charge them even for "the use of public space." When you go to eat rice in the mountains, do you pay the City Council "the rice fee for use of public space" with the receipt of the contribution? But who does the Prosecutor depend on ...? Well that. The measure of the socialist municipal group, which in principle seems "great".
It is a short-stick of the measure that was taken, from one day to the next, of raising pensions by 1.6% per year and being paid with the tax to these same large companies.
Another hoax in every way.
As Armando de Miguel says in his article: "We all know that the value of Spanish production grows every year by around 3% (perhaps more, if measured well).
Then everything that It is not to raise the value of pensions above that level of 3% per year represents a gigantic scam ...
", and apart from that, it is that there are no" finalist "taxes but the PSOE of Totana follows in the wake of propaganda , populism and illegalities, what their co-religionists follow at the national level.
The legionaries are a very different house. "How is it possible that at this point a finalist tax is implanted and nobody protests? Very simple: taxpayers think that raising taxes on" the rich "sounds very good.
It is so naive." To the local company and the development in general of this municipality and its inhabitants, many of us think that it would help them more, for example, reducing the municipal debt drastically and stopping paying hundreds of thousands of euros in annual interest to the banks.
Contemplating for this until the alienation of public assets, as said in the past elections from the candidate and current Mayor or the undersigned.
Restructuring the staff of our City Council, being austere with the expenditure of public money and ultimately, working from politics hand in hand with financial technicians to put us in sufficient economic capacity from our administration n local, to be able to invest in projects that can truly have an impact on the development of our municipality, commerce,tourism and the promotion of work. Everything else, they are nothing more than "occurrences" that seek to work little from politics and that others come to pay us for their political waste and null or bad management.
Without forgetting the small detail of having to be supporting local private companies with public money from our taxes.
As that absurd statement gives us to understand. What an example of "socialcapitalism" this of giving everyone's taxes, not to those most in need, but to other smaller private companies.
Different is that the State forces some of them to close.
Look to be "walking" our money, we first promote the model of serious cooperativism.
What for revolutionary, me.
We become shareholders of these local companies together with their owners to distribute profits, or losses annually and they will see how we stay to buy in Totana and send Amazon to hell.
More viable, reasonable, profitable and legal is my proposal than yours.
Definitely. Juan C.
Carrillo.
