| The mayor does not present the file of the sentence of the Contract of the Hotel and the Houses of the Holy in the file of the plenary session not to give explanations | The Mayor becomes "the Swede" in the plenary session of October and omits to give explanations about the payment of the sentence of the contract of the Hotel and the Houses of the Holy, when in addition the expenses and interests exceed almost € 450,000.00.€ 450,000.00 has cost the people of Totana the bad and negligent management of the Mayor, money that could have been used to help hoteliers, businesses, freelancers and neighbors in the face of the serious crisis that threatens us, and even to pay for security and Musealización of the Bastida to be able to finalize the museum of the Bastida, being a tourist reference for the municipality.Everything starts with the contract of the Hotel and Rural Houses of La Santa, in which the mayor participated in his day (1999-2003 legislature) and that from the first moment it was a very harmful contract for the town of Totana, since it generated a series of losses impossible for the City Council to bear.
The Popular Party in the 2011-2015 legislature reached an agreement with the concessionaire of the contract to prevent it from continuing to harm the municipal coffers, a contract that was rescinded by mutual agreement by both parties and that agreement recognized a deficiency that would end in 2025 , for the payment of the settlement by the City Council.This agreement was appealed by decision of this Mayor, Juan José Cánovas, with the approval of the Totanero PSOE in the 2015-2019 legislature, despite the fact that the legal services advised against it.
In the end, after the sentence, it costs the totaneros € 2,000,000.00 plus € 450,000.00 of expenses and interests (which have already had to be paid).The past plenary session of October and during the debate on the point in which the motion presented by the mayor's office for the cancellation and rectification of accounting balances in the municipal accounting of closed fiscal years, the mayor became "the Swedish" when asked about the Councilor of the PP, about where the documentation of said file was found since it did not appear as a complement to it, if a bank statement appeared in which the exit of money was indicated, but not the file of what and where they were going destined such amounts of money.When the PP asked about the amounts that were reflected in the bank statement, the mayor seemed to be "speaking in Chinese", and he replied that he did not know anything about it, that the intervener would have to explain that, which shows that He deceives the corporations and the group of totaneros, because he knew perfectly well that these amounts are the consequence of his whim to appeal an agreement that even the legal services discouraged.It is not that you do not know anything about this, it is that you are not interested in telling the people that due to their mismanagement the City Council has had to pay almost € 450,000.00 of expenses and interest, since these amounts reflected in the bank statement respond to the judgment of the contract of the Hotel and Rural Houses of La Santa.The Mayor hides from the corporations the record of the sentence of said contract in which the City Council is condemned to pay € 2,000,000.00 plus almost € 450,000.00 of expenses and interests, which shows the total lack of transparency that we have been denouncing from the PP totanero.The Mayor's whim to appeal an agreement to liquidate the contract, which had been signed when the PP governed by mutual agreement, and which we can consider as a good agreement before the "leonine" contract signed in its day by the PSOE-IU coalition, Against the advice of the council's legal department, it will cost the town of Totana almost € 450,000.00 in addition to having already had to pay the full sentence.The Popular Party of Totana requires the mayor to give explanations to the people of the results of his whim to appeal an agreement despite the fact that the legal services advised against it and that in the end it has been lost in the 1st, 2nd stay and in cassation and has led to pay the sentence plus interest.
