that does not meet the rules of the Cabildo "|
Who is right and who is wrong?
The enigmatic title of this writing for the magazine of Easter is intended to arouse among readers the curiosity to know how some issues are dealt with in the Cabildo and the desire to inform you so that you are the one who answers the question, without influences from no type.
If I can tell you that, before writing, I have collected and contrasted information to make sure what I say here, with the sole intention of improving our Easter, relations between all and stopping the deterioration, reluctance and loss of the essential delusion.
For this I am going to expose a series of questions that may be of interest:
• First of all, it must be said that there is a lack of debate, constructive dialogue and contrast of opinions.
As it has been normal in the almost 40 years that I know the plenary sessions of the Cabido.
With good manners, camaraderie and good humor, and without losing firmness when defending each one's opinion.
Always with education and the mind and ears ready to attend to the proposals of any partner, regardless of whether one did not initially agree with them.
Without any a priori imposition of criteria, or fixation of intransigent positions.
• We can all agree on the construction of a museum for Holy Week, but I have the impression, from the information I have, that it is very necessary to go deeper into the study of the subject.
It is not enough that it is feasible to carry out the adaptation works of the Cabildo headquarters.
It is essential to have objects of interest at the museum's disposal to be exhibited;
I don't think the idea of making reproductions is a good one, besides that they will have a significant cost.
It must be known how much it will cost the Cabildo to keep the museum open and what commitment is made.
• Regarding the video presented last year, which was said to be pending completion, I think it needs to be viewed and analyzed by independent people who have not participated in the preparation.
With this, ideas could be provided to improve it, even more if it is taken into account that it was secret even for the presidents of the Brotherhoods.
For your consideration, if deemed appropriate, I have provided some ideas:
Balance the presence of images and locutions, so that the participation of each of the Brotherhoods is more equitable.
Remove the car that crosses between the thrones.
Lower excessive personalisms.
Reduce the presence of the collection of Good Friday, when it is something secondary.
Symbolize the opening of Easter at the door of the church of Santiago and not in a blind that is more associated with a store, workshop or factory.
• Regarding the election of the Nazarene of Honor, it is convenient to rethink whether the way of doing it is objective enough.
Among the components of the commission that elect him may be people who propose candidates, sometimes up to two from the same Brotherhood, when others do not have anyone who can defend their proposal.
• Regarding economic matters, we must remember that if we have processions it is because we have Brotherhoods and Brotherhoods, not because we are organized in the Cabildo.
And who faces all the current expenses and investments are themselves.
This question should be enough for them to get part of the possible subsidies.
I have no doubt that some people will not agree with what is written, I even find it logical, some will say that what I say is not true, that nothing is contributed, that everything is done better, etc.
It's not important.
At least it will reflect after reading it, and what is important is your opinion and the aptitude of the presidents who represent us, once they value and analyze what is stated here.
Roque Murcia Crespo
