Juan Carlos Carrillo, councilor not attached to the city of Totana, has posted on his Facebook page a message about some statements by the spokesman of the platform "Ave Totana Fuerza Ciudadana" made to a local television.
The spokesman of the platform affirmed that after the Board of Spokesmen they transmitted to him that they were not going to be able to make a joint motion but they were going to support the emergency motion presented by one of the political parties.
"This Lord lies like a vellaco and he knows it and I ratify it in public.
It seems that in the end, he did not "understand" me well in the meeting, as he told me, kept to coordinate this matter before the plenary session or simply, he understood what came out of his soul and interested him.
What will that be?
It is good to want to get the political "pringue" to all other misfortune so blatantly.
The municipal political groups and this independent Councilman, do not get to agree to present a joint motion to the totaneros to give them to understand that we are all in the same line and seamless with this issue of ADIF for the simple fact that it is WIN TOTANA IU the one that prefers to take his way by free exercising the right that assists him for it, to present separately, a motion of urgency.
Putting as I said in the Potavoces Board Spokesman of this group, their party interests and desire to play a leading role in the symbolism that represents a joint statement of the entire Corporation.
There is more to talk about.
The funniest thing of all, is that in the end and as I said, many totaneros who listen to these statements of the Speaker of the platform may understand that in the absence of agreement among others, IU has come to put order.
When it was absurd to present urgent motions from a single municipal political group, when all agree.
When that motion of urgency was presented because the order of the day was already closed at that moment and not for anything else.
The PP is forced to submit another one with some amendments to include in the emergency that had already been previously seen and agreed.
Mr. Spokesman of the platform, why did not you insist to the IU Spokesman not to take this path alone and join a joint statement that was what you intended, and now comes to understand that thanks to IU Has he been able to produce this unity agreement?
It is clear that you understand what you want, when you want and how you want.
But to me, you are not going to cheat or disparage me in a meeting as an attempt with others.
And even less will I allow him to lie with that joy and impudence.
Greetings.
Juan Carlos Carrillo "
